Two stanzas this time — but I think 1.5(b) is probably superfluous, hence the ‘(b)’.
1.5
A languid month he’d lain — and waited –
Withdrawn into his attic room,
Had let that thought gestate — debated:
‘Shall I abort that seed of doom?…
Why bother? It’s a plaything! Foolish!…
Starvation’s made my thinking ghoulish
And added to my stomach-pains
The morbid toys of addled brains…’
Yet as he viewed with deep derision
Those radical dark reveries
He’d once indulged, his fantasies…
His impotence and indecision –
He’d feel anew the desperate need
To do some — no… to do that deed.
1.5(b)
But even now, the town surrounds him
With spying windows, statues, eyes.
Some thing – within? without him? – hounds him.
How compromised is his disguise?
He’s overdone with endless stewing –
Excessive thought, deficient doing:
Is he the gloomy dithering Dane,
Or Cawdor’s gory-handed thane?
… On third thought — fourth? — far better fearful
And yet uncaught than overbold.
(Siberia is very cold.)
So: ‘Step by step. Stay cool. Look cheerful.’
Rodya, resolved, regains the street;
The cobbles flash beneath his feet!






Today in Porn
o: ‘Even Porn Needs Style’Style rules, that is.
A former copy editor for Hustler gave a presentation on ‘What it’s like to edit at Hustler magazine’ at the 2012 conference of the American Copy Editors [sic] Society (in New Orleans!). The conference’s blog has a brief write-up, linked above. If you click through, you’ll learn that Hustler‘s stylebook prefers ‘porn’ to ‘porno’, and ‘girl-next-door’ to ‘girl next door’, inter alia.
But the main story here is not in the semi-prurient content of the session and the write-up: It’s in the mainstreaming of pornography — the trend that made this presentation at a professional conference thinkable at all (even if the conference is in New Orleans).
(Can anyone suggest a less curmudgeonly note on which to end this post?)